May 9, 2008 – 5:36 pm
Anonymous have declared May the month of “Operation: Fair Game: STOP” to protest the Scientology enterprises tax-exempt domestic and international terror policies and practices known collectively as “Fair Game.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercive_persuasion
California Appellate courts have ruled that the constitutional freedom of religious belief does not preclude state investigation and prosecution of religiously motivated conduct that is criminal, tortuous or a violation of civil and human rights.
http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/fair-game-not-constitutional.htm
http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/cal3d/46/1092.html
Molko v. Holy Spirit Assn., (1988) 46 Cal.3d 1092, 1114.
On March 15, 2008, during the Anonymous global Operation Reconnect picket at L. Ron Hubbard Way in Los Angeles, Scientology attorney Moxon had his long-time nemesis Graham Berry served with a May 5, 2008 Federal Court Judgment Debtor examination relating to one of the many frauds upon three courts that Moxon and his co-counsels (such as Helena Kobrin, Ava Paquette, Gerald Chaleff, Gerald Feffer, Monique Yingling, Eric Lieberman, Samuel D. Rosen, Barbara Reeves, Michael Turrill, Bradley S. Pauley, William T. Drescher, Elliot Abelson, Gary Soter, David Chodos, Richard Fond, James Martin, among others), committed in order to derail Berry’s winning streaks against the Scientology R.I.C.O. enterprise. Indeed, it was Samuel Rosen, from the giant Paul, Hastings law firm, who implored Judge Snyder that, “Berry has to be stopped.” One of his co-counsel Eric Lieberman, also from New York, had just bitterly complained that “Berry, like Lazarus, has risen from the dead.” Subsequently, the sanctions of $28,000 (plus 10% interest) were imposed nine years ago in the Pattinson v. Church of Scientology International case and in connection with an allegation that:
“54. Defendant Kendrick L. Moxon (”Moxon”) is a resident of the City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, State of California and was a Deputy Guardian engaged (as an unindicted co-conspirator) in the vast Scientology criminal activities leading to the arrest and imprisonment of certain senior Scientologists in Washington, D.C. and elsewhere, for the largest ever known criminal infiltration of the United States Government, in which capacity he has been responsible for, or participated in, various of the criminal, fraudulent and unethical activities alleged herein and either directed at, or damaging to the Defendant. Moxon is employed within the Office of Special Affairs as an attorney although he has variously held himself out as an attorney with the law firms of Bowles & Moxon, Moxon & Bartilson and Moxon & Kobrin. The Office of Special Affairs, in addition to handling legal matters in accordance with Scientology policies of abusing the legal system, has, since the closing of the Guardians Office, controlled and directed many of Scientology’s covert intelligence gathering and harassment operations. Defendant Moxon conceived the Bowles & Moxon Plan 100 to destroy IRS section 501(c)(3) organization the “Cult Awareness Network,” filed over 50 merit-less lawsuits intended to, and which did, bankrupt it completely, and directed and participated in various of the human rights violations, civil rights violations abuses and abuses of the legal and judicial system alleged herein.”http://www.lermanet.com/cos/pattinson1.htm
http://www.lermanet.com/reference/Graham_Berry/criminalcomplaint.htm
You can see photographs of attorney Moxon and the “after service” photographs of Graham Berry at the March 15, 2008 picket:
http://picasaweb.google.com/grahamberryesq/2AnonymousComplaintPhotoAppendix2April12th
Later, I wrote a letter of objection to Scientology attorney Moxon. You can read it here:
http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?highlight=graham+berry&t=26968
http://forums.enturbulation.org/17-archive/graham-berry-statement-ava-paquette-10037/
Consequently, Cinco de Mayo (the 5 th of May) was a good day for Anonymous and this fraudulently designated “vexatious litigant” to respond to Scientologys continued Fair Gaming of me and to protest other abuses of America’s own Taliban, taking over the United States one citizen at a time.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22fair+game+and+graham+berry%22&hl=en&pwst=1&start=10&sa=N
http://forums.enturbulation.org/15-breaking-news/los-angeles-flash-raid-12285/
An outline and summary of some of Scientology’s Fair Game policies and practices (the policies and practices for handling Suppressive Persons) can be read at paragraphs 144-207 of the First Amended Pattinson complaint. http://www.lermanet.com/cos/pattinson1.htm
At 11:30 a.m. Kone, Mr. X and I arrived at the Beaux Arts Hollywood Guaranty Building (H.G.B.) at 6331 Hollywood Boulevard in Los Angeles. It was built in 1923 and it is rich in Hollywood history and gossip, having once housed the famous gossip columnist Hedda Hopper. However, since 1989, the H.G.B. has housed much of Scientologys upper middle management executive strata, the Scientologys Office of Special Affairs (O.S.A.), its legal “front” law firm of Moxon & Kobrin and other “in-house” or “in-cult” lawyers such as Elliot Abelson and William Drescher. It also houses the World Institute of Scientology Enterprises (W.I.S.E.). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Institute_of_Scientology_Enterprises
Deceptively Scientology claims that W.I.S.E. is not part of the Church-owned group of corporations that are the sole occupant of the most important Scientology management building outside of GoldBase at Gilman Hot Springs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Base
In essence, W.I.S.E. is corporate $cientology’s tax-exempt vehicle for collecting a 10% tax upon the gross profits of most Scientologist-owned businesses (including those owned by its “celebrity” members). W.I.S.E. is also $cientology’s “front group” for “routing” and “regging” W.I.S.E. business employees into the never-ending expense Church of Scientology services such as courses and processing. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=routing+and+w.i.s.e.+and+Scientology&btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=list+of+members+and+w.i.s.e.+and+Scientology&btnG=Search
A condition of the 1993 Secret Tax Settlement Agreement between the Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) and the-166 plus corporations and Churches of Scientology required the Scientology enterprise to disband W.I.S.E. Instead, the Scientology enterprise has done another of its corporate shuffles and asset transfers. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Cowen/essays/irs.html and http://www.xenu.net/archive/IRS/ and http://www.sc-i-r-s-ology.pair.com/documents/1993-10-01closingagrmt.html
The H.G.B. reacted quickly to the arrival of Kone, Mr. X and me. All Scientologists were confined inside. Kone, dressed in his Anonymous outfit, was carrying a picket sign that read “Scientology: The “Church” Of Fair Game” on one side and “LRH was on Psych Drugs when he died” on the other side. This is a legendary picket sign and has been carried in many epic protests by Old Guard martyr Keith Henson. For three months during the summer of 2001, Keith Henson picketed Scientology’s Gold Base all day and every day, all by himself except for occasional daily company by people such as Arel Henson, Jeff Jacobson, Shy David, Barbara Graham and me, with wonderful hospitality provided by the incomparable Ida Camburn of Hemet. At different times O.S.A. and Moxon have had eight private investigators stationed on Ida’s block and a huge R.V. electronically listening to her communications. I ask each of you to read and circulate this 84-year-old battlers story. http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn/
You can read more about Keith Henson at: http://www.operatingthetan.com/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Henson and http://www.xenu-directory.net/critics/henson1.html
Keith Henson and his wife are still being brutally “Fair Gamed” by O.S.A. and Moxon & Kobrin in one of the longest running and most expensive personal bankruptcy proceedings in U.S. Bankruptcy Court history. There, the cult has been spending millions of tax-free dollars on “Fair Gaming” two citizens in their mid-sixties out of the approximately $250,000 equity in their home and any reasonable retirement or continuing work prospects. http://www.operatingthetan.com/bankind.htm Keith Henson was one of the major players in Church of Scientology versus the Internet. http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/cos/rnewman/home.html and http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/cos/rnewman/whatsnew.html and http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/cos/rnewman/media/amlawyer-3.96.html
Keith Henson, muzzled for another two years, would have been proud of the young Anonymous now carrying his old picket sign. I could not find my favorite picket sign that reads “$cientology: Cult of Blackmail, Bribery and Fraud www.xenu.net” Instead, I was carrying a picket sign that read “Freedom? Find out the truth: Xenu.Net” on the one side and “Hubbard Died on Psych Drugs” on the other side. Mister X also did superior sterling service as the official photographer du jour along with a LAist photographer. LAist deserves Anonymous acclamation for receiving over 225,000 visits to its photographs of the March 15 Anonymous picket in Los Angeles. http://www.laist.com/2008/03/15/anonymous_march15_protest_anti_war.php and links there to other Anonymous picket pictures.
Mr. X has his own long and storied history with the Old Guard. He frequently served luminaries such as Jesse Prince, Stacy Brooks and the just-out Tory Christman as the “get away” driver from O.S.A. tails. Once Jesse Prince was driven to one side of a Burbank restaurant which Jesse dashed through to the other side where Mister X was waiting with his engine revving and ready to roll. But he was stopped: by a teetering Bob Hope trying to get through the door to his own car. Fortunately, Mister X and Jesse Prince were still able to drive off in a cloud of dust and small stones while the Moxon-O.S.A. “tails” impatiently waited on the other side of the restaurant.
We were soon joined by two other Anonymice; or should they be Anonymouses? http://www.painintheenglish.com/post.php?id=560 Anyway, one of them whipped out his own picket sign that read, “Scientology’s Sea Org uses slave labor, drives families apart, coerces members to have abortions. WhyWeProtest.Net Xenu.Net.”
This small group of three people with picket signs and three people with cameras immediately paralyzed the entire twelfth floor Church of Scientology management building and the adjacent two-floor Religious Technology Center (R.T.C.) building. All of Scientology’s top middle managers and its brutal Office of Special Affairs had been brought to a state of helpless inactivity by the attempted communication of a few picket signs with Internet website locations. The curtains and blinds of all of the buildings were drawn shut. No staff members could enter or leave through the front of the building. When I was not carrying my picket sign around the Ivar Avenue side of the H.G.B. a few uniformed Sea Organization staff members would be allowed to literally run across the street to the R.T.C. building and rush inside in case I rounded the corner with my picket sign and cause them to go into the Scientology “condition of doubt.” The only thing that one can conclude about the Scientology management buildings is that there is not a single Operating Thetan there. Otherwise Anonymous would not be on their doorstep and sidewalk. Perhaps they should have called in Tom Cruise to “smash the Suppressives” into “a footnote of history.”
Our little protest and picket had not been going very long before the Los Angeles Police Department glided by on their three-wheeled electric Segways. All smiles and laughs they said, “You guys are three weeks late for the picket,” referring to the global Anonymous Operation Re-Connect pickets of April 12, 2008. “No, were a week early for the next one,” I shot back. “You’re coming back?” the other L.A.P.D. officer laughed. “Yes,” I said, “This Saturday. Expect us.”
At 12:45 p.m. we changed picket locations by taking the Hollywood Freeway downtown to the new Federal Courts building at 255 Temple Street, Los Angeles. We parked in the lot directly opposite the courthouse and by 1:15 p.m. we were resuming our Cinco de Moxon protest; two photographers and three picketers. Within seconds, we were approached by Homeland Security Officers. After they satisfied their official curiosity they left us alone to have our half-hour picket of the location that had become Scientology’s pre-emptive strike at Anonymous and “Operation: Fair Game: STOP.” Poor Mr. Moxon and Ms. Paquette of O.S.A. The Anonymous picket caused them to walk the long way into the Courthouse they had misused so often and with such reprehensible corruption and law enforcement inaction. You can see the days picket pictures at these two locations: http://laist.com/2008/05/05/anonymous_prote_1.php and http://picasaweb.google.com/grahamberryesq/May508OSA6331HollywoodFederalCourthouse255EastTemple
At 1:45 p.m. we stopped picketing and returned to the vehicle where we deposited our picket signs and I donned a black shirt, red tie and black suit jacket. The three Anonymous, Mister X and I crossed the street and entered the Federal District Courthouse. As we did so Homeland Security Officers pointed a man out and informed us that he had been furtively photographing us during our protest. We then took the elevator to Court Room 550 on the fifth floor where we entered U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman’s courtroom. We were expected!
As the five of us walked in I saw Scientology attorneys Kendrick Moxon and Ava Paquette seated to the right. “There are B.T. s and Clusters in the courtroom,” I loudly announced as I walked towards the desk of the Courts clerk to “check in.” As I walked past Moxon he blurted, “Chicken hawk.” Is he referring to me, Barrister Berry? I thought. “Whats a chicken hawk, Moxon?” I responded. These guys are such slime bags, I thought. They defame others while themselves harboring and protecting child molesters and rapists and Fair Gaming anyone who reports or exposes such conduct. Last month one of their goons even tried to run former Scientologist Tommy Gorman’s parents off the road. http://www.lermanet.com/tomgorman/tommygorman.htm and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=h0o&q=tommy+gorman%22+and+Scientology&btnG=Search and http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?highlight=tommy+gorman&t=27042 and www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22tommy+gorman%22&search_type=(lots of videos on OSA harassment).
Ex-O.S.A. operative Tommy Gorman is now one of the most active Anonymous participants in San Francisco and a real thorn in the side of his old Org. Almost every week Tommy’s car tires are slashed or some other form of auto vandalism carried out. Lately, the level of O.S.A. harassment of Tommy has been dangerously escalated. The Scientology legal front of Moxon & Kobrin (and Ava Paquette) are very busy carrying out simultaneous Fair Game terrorism attacks on dozens of citizens, while being protected (when necessary to “Keep Scientology Working”) by Scientology attorneys Gerald Chaleff (the L.A.P.D. attorney and command team member) and Paul Paquette (L.A.P.D. - R.I.C.O. consent decree compliance at the L.A. City Attorney’s Office). For example, the brave young ladies of www.exScientologykids.org are being “Fair Gamed” by Moxon and Paquette.
There are also reports that Moxon’s private investigators and thugs have been “Fair Gaming” Jenna Miscavige’s young husband. Scientology’s O.S.A. has also fully protected itself within the California State Bar. Every complaint against Moxon and his cohorts is rejected as disclosing no wrongful conduct. Meanwhile, Moxon & Kobrin/O.S.A. routinely churn out California State Bar complaints against uncooperative opposing counsel. There were over ten against me in the 1990’s and over 23 against Michael Flynn of Boston in the 1980s. This is one of the reasons that less than a handful of lawyers nationwide are willing to regularly litigate against the Scientology enterprise. http://www.wfial.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=artScientology.article_10 and http://home.snafu.de/tilman/bu/wol_vs_cos.html and http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology_v._Wollersheim
I had just taken my seat in the public gallery of Court Room 550, along with the Anonymous observers, when Rick Moxon snarled, “Berry, I saw you lifting your leg outside. The fire hydrant looks damaged.” Surprised, I responded, “That’s because you were sitting on it again, Rick” The court room laughed and Moxon shrunk. Within moments he was saved by the Judge who entered the courtroom.
“All rise, United States District Court in session, Judge Stephen Hillman presiding,” shouted the Court Clerk. The Judge took his seat at the bench while his clerk called the one case on the calendar, Michael Pattinson v. Church of Scientology International CV 98-3985 CAS (SHx), “Would counsel please state their appearances.”Moxon, Paquette and I walked to the podium besides counsels tables. “Kendrick Moxon and Ava Paquette for the Judgment Creditor,” said Moxon. “Graham Berry, appearing for himself your honor,” I added. “Please swear the witness,” said the Judge as I raised my right hand, listened to the Courts Clerk read the Oath to tell the truth and responded, “I do.” The Judge then proceeded to read a list of admonitions or instructions. “Your Honor,” I said. “I have been through this proceeding a number of times with Mr. Moxon.” “Maybe you have,” said the U.S. Magistrate Judge, “but I am still required to give these admonitions.” When he had finished he instructed us to proceed to the Debtors Examination in his conference room.
“Oh, there is one matter, Judge” called Moxon. “Yes?” asked Judge Hillman. “Your Honor,” said Moxon. “There are these Anonymous people in the courtroom. They came with Mr. Berry and they were all picketing outside the courthouse and they were laughing and talking in the courtroom. I think Mr. Berry is going to bring them into the Debtors Examination and Im afraid they are just here to disrupt the proceedings, to make a mockery of them, and I want the Court to order that they be excluded.” I had been pacing back and forth behind counsels table while Moxon whined. I stepped up to the podium microphone and responded, “Your Honor, the case law is clear that a Debtors Examination is a public proceeding to which the public may attend. I object to any exclusion of the people in the gallery.” Judge Hillman acted appropriately. “Mr. Moxon. This is not a deposition in a lawyers office. You have chosen to conduct a public proceeding at the Courthouse and I am not excluding any member of the public without cause. I am sure the young men in the gallery are going to behave themselves and remain silent otherwise I will issue an order excluding them.” I replied, “Thank you Your Honor,” I responded as the Judge left the bench and we left the courtroom and set up in the small conference room beside Courtroom 550.
Round One to Anonymous, I thought.
There was a table in the middle of the Courts conference room, a modern room with white walls and government furniture. The three Anonymous and Mr. X sat on chairs against one wall. I sat in front of them facing Kendrick Moxon and Ava Paquette on the other side of a small table. At the end of the table sat the court reporter. She is employed by the largest nation-wide court reporting service in the United States, Atkinson-Baker. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Kolts was sued by the Church of Scientology for refusing to use the Atkinson-Baker court reporting services because it was affiliated with the Church of Scientology that was a party in the relevant lawsuit. http://www.xenu.net/archive/CourtFiles/occf37.html
Atkinson-Baker nationwide court reporters is a member of the World Institute of Scientology Enterprises (W.I.S.E.) and it is owned by two Scientologists whose allegiance must always be to “Keeping Scientology Working #1″ before it is to their oath as a court reporter. Through Atkinson-Baker, the Church of Scientology is able to have immediate notice of any mention of Scientology in a deposition or other legal proceeding and O.S.A., often through the legal unit of Moxon & Kobrin, is able to promptly take the most effective preemptive Fair Game action. “Equal Justice under Law” in America has been reduced to a mere inscription on the exterior of the United States Supreme Court building. Ava Paquette’s husband Paul is a Church of Scientology plant in the Los Angeles City Attorneys Office where he is in charge of the City of Los Angeles Police Department compliance with the Department of Justice and L.A.P.D. Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (R.I.C.O.) consent decree. “How convenient,” as Saturday Night Live’s Church Lady would say.
Curiously, this Atkinson-Baker court reporter was unable to give me her business card. “I just gave my last two Mr. Moxon and Ms. Paquette,” she said. Every time Moxon and Paquette left the Judgment Debtor examination the Atkinson-Baker court reporter left with them. “What was that about?” the public observers asked me later. “It was about the sort of corruption that is not supposed to happen in American justice but which is rampant in the Los Angles court system these days whenever Scientology is involved. It hasn’t always been that way,” I replied. This is what happens when well-meaning but timid people turn their back on corruption and injustice thinking that if they just see and hear no evil it will always pass them by. One day they find the evil comes for those they care about and there is no longer anything that can be done about it:
“First they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak out - because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the Communists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out -because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me!”
Pastor Niemoller (probably spoken to a group of students in 1946 as his answer to the question: Why didn’t the churches get involved [in opposing the Nazis?]
Anyway, I digress from our arrival in the Federal Court conference room for yet another of the many Moxon & Kobrin debtor examinations/depositions of me. They have deposed me a total of over twenty-one days! I was the last person into Judge Hillman’s conference room. Moxon and Paquette were unpacking and the Atkinson-Baker court reporter was taking down the names of the Anonymous in attendance. “Whoa,” I forcefully said to the court reporter. “Ive got to take their names as being in attendance,” she responded. “No you don’t,” I said. “It is no different than if these guys were sitting in the gallery of the court room and we were doing this before the Judge. He would not be taking their names. “Ive already got their names,” she gloated while gesturing towards two of the Anon, and then she turned to Mister X (not the one on Entrubulation.Org). “And who are you?” said our aggressive Scientology court reporter. “Mister X,” replied the gray-haired middle-aged man. Moxon had just sat down but he shot to his feet again. “That’s it,” he snarled. “I’m going to the Judge to get an order that they all give me their names.” Moxon stormed out of the conference room and back into the cavernous court room. “Is there a problem already?” asked the surprised court clerk. “I need to see the Judge. Berry won’t let me get the names of those in attendance.” The court clerk looked at me and I responded, “That’s right. It’s no different than if they were sitting in the gallery of this court room.” The court clerk stood up and proceeded towards the door to the Judges chambers. “I’ll be right back,” she said. In the meantime she left Moxon and me alone. “Oh, Moxon,” I said. “Why don’t you read the writing on the wall? Leave Scientology. Leave it now. I’ll help you. Il’l look after you. Just like I have done with all of the others.” Moxon was responding with a grunt and a snarl just as the Judge’s clerk returned to the courtroom and walked over to where I was smiling at a glaring Moxon. “The Judge said that he is not coming out and if you have a problem for the court then you will have to take it over to Judge Snyder in the old court house building one block over.” Moxon spun on his heels and shrunk back to the conference room. There was none of the disgusting arrogance of the Nazi storm trooper he has rudely pretended to be on a number of occasions: http://www.google.com/search?q=moxon+and+caberta+and+salute&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
Round Two to Anonymous, I thought.
I sat down and suggested Moxon start the examination, or in this case, the inquisition. It lasted about an hour and it was not pretty. In fact, it was an ugly example of Moxon’s continued license to use tax-exempt monies to misuse the judicial process to harass to harass Scientology’s enemies and not to resolve legitimate disputes. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Fishman/Declaration/exhibg.html I was the successful lead counsel in this landmark “win” against Scientology.
As for this judgment debtor examination, Ill just bullet-point the condensed highlights, most memorable topics, and dialogue as I remember them approximately. When I receive the transcript I will post it for your own evaluation and comment.
The court reporter started to take my oath to testify truthfully when Moxon informed her that I had been sworn before the Judge. Moxon stared across the table at me, smirking like the cat that had just swallowed the canary. “Moxon, this is the session. This is the session,” I said softly across the table to Moxon. He blinked.
- “Are you suspended from the practice of law?” Moxon asked me. “No, I am not, as you well know from having sought it during so many state bar complaints against me. I took a voluntary nine month suspension in 2002 so that I could assist with the care of my 78-year-old mother who was dying of ovarian cancer in New Zealand.”
[That was more important to me than staying in California to fight a Scientology corrupted state bar lynching. Because I returned to New Zealand to assist, my mother was able to die at home surrounded by her loving family.];
- “Are you current with your State Bar Mandatory Continuing Education Requirements? Did you comply with the last M.C.L.E. reporting requirement?” “Yes, I am current with my M.C.L.E. requirements and I did comply with the last reporting requirement for my M.C.L.E. alphabet group,”
- “How did you afford to renew your State Bar license?” “With money from fees received from a client.” [Curiously, Scientology attorney Samuel D. Rosen has failed to pay his current New York State Bar dues although he continues to represent Scientology against Keith Henson!]
- “Who was the client?” “I’m not telling you for the reasons set forth in the Hooser case on which I wrote you a three-page letter about last Friday.” [In Hooser v. Superior Court (2000) 84 Cal. App. 4th 997, 1005-1008, the fourth District Court of Appeals held that “the identity of an attorney’s clients is sensitive personal information that implicates the client’s rights of privacy … unless the consultation is disclosed to third parties, through the filing of a law suit, the open representation of the client in dealing with third parties or in some other manner.”
We were about five minutes into the examination when Moxon stopped the questioning and said, “Berry. You’ve brought all of these young boys here today. Do their mothers know they are with you?” I was incredulous. “That man over there, Mister X, is approaching sixty years of age,” I replied. Moxon was unrelenting. “Well, the other three. They look as though they are between 12 and 16,” drooled Moxon. I was even more incredulous. “Each of these young men is in his twenties,” I responded. “Yes, I’m twenty and my parents do know where I am,” interjected Kone as I shushed him not to speak during the proceeding.
Round Three to Anonymous, I thought.
- “Did you file a Schedule C with your last tax return?” “Yes, I did.”
- “Produce your tax returns for the years 2005 through 2007?” I did so. Moxon pored over them. Looking at the 2007 return he says, “You say you only earned $5,197.00 last year?” “No, Mr. Moxon, if you looked at the Schedule C you asked about a little while ago you see that I reported income of $7,456.00.” Moxon grunted and turned the pages to Schedule C. “You only made that much, Berry? That’s less than the poverty level, Berry. Do you realize you’re a Pauper, Berry? You’re a Pauper. Why don’t you work, Berry?” Somewhat surprised I responded, “Through blackmail, bribery and corruption you destroyed my career. And you continue to do so through your posts about me to websites such as www.ReligiousFreedomWatch.Org and www.Parishioners.Org [and then there would be the O.S.A. private investigators regularly visiting the senior management of any law firm I were with, as has occurred so often in the past.]
- “You’re lying, Berry.” As if merely mouthing the word makes it so, I thought.
[I am a litigator, and a damn good one, who was improperly declared a vexatious litigant through O.S.A., Chaleff, Moxon, Kobrin, Paquette and Abelson crime, fraud and public corruption. How does a vexatious litigant get a job with a litigation law firm? Most opposing counsel are going to try and slime me with at least footnote regarding the fraudulently procured rulings and punishments. It happened when I successfully defended Bent Corydon in major civil litigation from 2004-2006. Indeed, the L.A.P.D. and D.A. recommended criminal prosecution of the various Scientology and attorney participants but this was blocked by further O.S.A. and Moxon/Elliot Abelson/Gerald Chaleff instigated public corruption. A fact they now brazenly chuckle over with all of the arrogance of assumed immunity from law enforcement action against their chicanery. I continue to pray that one day justice will be done, and an action will be filed to set aside the vexatious litigant and other orders on the ground of fraud(s) upon the court(s). Perhaps through pro bono representation by a legal heavy-weight such as former Justice Elwood Lui of Jones Day’s San Francisco office, former Secretary of State Warren Christopher of O’Melveny & Myers or former Solicitor General Ted Olson of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. The evidence, arguments and evidence in my favor is overwhelming and beyond any reasonable doubt. However, O.S.A., Monique Yingling, Gerald Feffer, Gerald Chaleff, Elliott Abelson, Samuel Rosen, Kendrick Moxon, Helena Kobrin and Ava Paquette have so muddied the Los Angeles legal waters that my effective exoneration requires the intervention and imprimatur of a leader of the California bar; something that is also in the best interests of the sullied California State Bar Association itself.]
- “Have you represented any clients in litigation over the past year besides Bent Corydon? Who were they?”“Mr. Moxon, the answer is yes and no. Yes, I have represented someone in litigation besides Bent Corydon and no, I am not going to identify the client. I represented the client in an out-of-state deposition. He has paid his fees in full and they are reflected on my 2007 income tax return. He has a reasonable expectation of privacy and does not want to be harassed by your law firm and its private investigators,” I responded. “You’re a liar, Berry,” snarled Moxon;
- “How much money have you earned in 2008? Who from?”“I have received $262.00 and it did not involve a litigation matter so I am asserting the client’s right of privacy. There is no money owing.”
- “ You’ve only received $262.00 this year?” “That’s not what I testified Mr. Moxon,” I said. “ I’ve also received a $150.00 gift.” Moxon shot back, “Who gave you the gift?” I replied, “Objection, privacy of third persons.”
- “Do you pay rent where you live?” “No, I do not,” [thanks to the generosity of my former Scientologist housemate Ms. Jane Scott. Her former husband gave over one million dollars to the Scientology enterprise before she divorced him!] “ Do you work for Jane Scott?” “No.” “Do you have a bank account, trust account, credit card, etc?” “No.”
- “How do your clients pay you?” “Sometimes in cash and sometimes by check, but I only have pro bono clients now.”
- “If you don’t have a bank account, how do you cash a client’s check?” “I’ll endorse it over to someone like Jane Scott or use a check-cashing facility,” I replied.”
- “Do you have a retirement account?” “No. You took away those prospects too.”
- “Do you have any stocks, bonds, safety deposit boxes, etc.” “No,” I repeatedly responded.
- “Do you own any real estate?” “No, Mr. Moxon, you caused me to lose that too,” I replied.
- “Do you own a car?” “No, Mr. Moxon. As I told you last time, you took that and did so unlawfully, through Ava Paquette lying to the court about its value.” Moxon snarled, back, “You mean that old Jeep Cherokee.” I responded, “Yes.” I loved that 1988 Jeep Cherokee Laredo. It had faithfully hauled thousands of boxes of Scientology litigation documents, many dozens of Suppressive Persons and when it was seized through Ava Paquette’s perjury it was proudly displaying large rear and side window posters reading: “WWW.XENU.NET What Scientology Doesn’t Want You To Read.”
- “How did you get to this courthouse today?” “ I borrowed one of Jane Scott’s cars.”
- “How much money do you have in your pocket?” I rummaged through my wallet and counted bank notes. “$27.00. All the money that I have in the world.”
- “How much did you earn in 2006?” “You’ve got the tax returns. It’s there,” I said. “$18, 258.00?” asked Moxon. “Whatever it says there,” I replied.
- “Are you on Medicaid or Medicare?” “No.”
- “Do you receive welfare payments and food stamps?” “No.”
- “You were on welfare and food stamps. Why did you stop?” “When I went to New Zealand to care for my mother the payments were terminated.”
- “Why didn’t you go back on welfare when you returned?” “Because I took over Bent Corydon’s defense [successfully] and started receiving income, $200 per week and then $400 per week.”
- “Why don’t you go on welfare now?” “I’ve heard of so many Church of Scientology staff members and Sea Organization members receiving welfare payments, food stamps and other government assistance that I have hesitated to further burden the public coffers.” [In my humble opinion, the tax-exempt Scientology enterprise has more scams going in a day than most con men could imagine in a lifetime!]
- “Does Jane Scott pay for your food?” “Sometimes,” I replied. “And when I am with other people they often pay. Unlike the Church of Scientology, most people engage in charity and do not have a religious “doctrine of exchange” requiring that money be exchanged for every service or need. For example, when I was in New Zealand recently my Dad paid for my food.”
- “Are you owed any money?” “Yes, Bent Corydon. I represented him in litigation for nearly three years,” I replied. “How much does he owe you?” “It’s on the last bill,” I answered. “Produce it?” I handed over the last fee statement because the Corydon fee statements had been filed in court in connection with his lawsuit. “You allege that he owes you $428,000?” Moxon mocked. “He has never questioned it,” I responded. “Why isn’t he paying you?” “He stopped the $400 per week payments last year when he said his business could no longer afford to comply with our payment arrangement of $400 per week and that he needed the money for his adult son’s problems,” I replied. “He’s good for the debt,” I said. “He has a largely unencumbered three-million dollar building.” “ What have you done to collect the money?” “I gave him notice of his arbitration rights which he ignored. Later in the year I will be filing a law suit against him.”
- “Do you owe any debts?” “Actually, I do. It’s basically the same list as before. I’ve updated it for you and I have it right here among my papers,” I answered. I then leaned over the table and went through a stack of papers I had brought with me. I couldn’t find the list I had typed. I kept going back and forth through the papers. Moxon started breathing heavily. He was impatient and agitated. “Just tell me,” he commanded. “Oh no, I wouldn’t want to be inaccurate. I would much prefer just to give you the list. Maybe I should just mail it to you later,” I said as I kept rummaging through the papers (an old trial lawyers jury tactic). Soon Moxon could take the silence no longer. “You, Anonymous! I want the court record to reflect that the young man behind Berry [Kone] is making faces and expressions at me. He’s disrupting the proceedings. I going to go before the Judge and have him held in contempt.” I looked up and yawned, “Mr. Moxon, he’s doing nothing of the sort. Why don’t you just get on with your questioning?” Kone interjected again, “I was not making faces at all.” “Shush,” I said again. Of course, I couldn’t avoid dropping three small 8 ½ x 11 ½ picket signs: (1) “WHO KILLED L. RON HUBBARD? ASK DM. http://www.clambake.org/archive/hubbardcoroner/ http://www.lermanet.com/exit/berrying.html;” (2) “HUBBARD DIED ON PYSCH DRUGS! ASK Dr. DENK & DM. http://www.clambake.org/archive/hubbardcoroner/ http://www.lermanet.com/exit/berrying.html; (3) “HUBBARD DIED BUT HIS FRAUDS AND CRIMES LIVE ON! ASK SP DM. HUBBARD: KING OF CONS. http://www.lermanet.com/LRonHubbard.htm
“Just mail the list,” Moxon snarled as Ava Paquette continued to frantically scrawl on small papers notes and to thrust them under Moxon’s scowling gaze.
- “Are you a beneficiary under your father’s will?” “Objection, third party privacy and I do not know,” I answered.
- “How much is your father’s estate worth?” “Objection, Privacy and speculation.” “You can guess. What’s it worth $100,000?” “I am not going to speculate?” “ You can guess. What’s it worth $200,000?” “I am not going to speculate?” “You can guess. What’s it worth $300,000?” “I am not going to speculate.” And Moxon continued like this up through the numbers until he had said: “You can guess. What’s your father’s estate worth? One million dollars?” “I am not going to speculate, Mr. Moxon.”
- “Are you a beneficiary under your sister’s will?” “Objection, third party privacy,” I responded.
- “Will you receive any money from your father when he dies?” “Objection, it requires me to speculate.”
- “Do you have a will? Produce it.” “I do have a will and I object to producing it on the ground of privacy,” I responded.
- “Are you the beneficiary under any trusts?” “I don’t know,” I said. “I think I am but I have received legal advice that I am not.”
- “Who was the lawyer who gave you the advice?” “He’s dead now,” I answered.
- “Why do you think you are the beneficiary of a trust?” “Because I have read that I am in a discretionary family and inheritor’s trust.”
- “What’s the trust say?” “I can’t recall exactly, read it for yourself,” I responded.
- “Did you bring a copy with you?” “Your subpoena commanded me to,” I replied as I found two documents among my papers and handed two copies of the two documents to Moxon and Paquette respectively.
The two of them looked through the first document. Moxon asked who the people (the trustees) were and I responded, “My cousins.” “Do you know who prepared this?” asked Moxon. “Someone in my fathers lawyers office,” I said. “When?” snapped Moxon. Earlier this year when I was in New Zealand,” I answered. “Who paid for your air ticket to New Zealand?” asked Moxon. “My Dad,” I replied. “And Miss Law? Is she really one of your father’s lawyers?” asked Moxon in a mocking tone as he looked at the name of the witness to my signature. Moxon was clearly becoming furious. “And this so-called Trust,” he said, “It is really called The Bee Jay Trust?” “Moxon, stop polluting this proceeding with your foul mind,” I said as the entire row of Anonymous behind me tried to contain their laughter and lusty imaginations. Meanwhile, Moxon and Paquette seemed gob- smacked, no pun intended. Was the Bee Jay Trust a “rick-roll” or was it really a genuine family maintenance and support trust? They did not know which way to proceed and so they left the Bee Jay Trust and all that it represents.
Round Four to Anonymous, I concluded again.
- “And what’s this next document. Is that part of the demand?” Moxon asked. “No, but I thought that you might appreciate it,” I replied. Moxon put the fat second document in his brief case and later Ava Paquette did the same.
The “second document” was a transcript of the Marc Headley Gosslip Radio interview broadcast several weeks ago. Marc Headley is a former Scientologist Sea Organization member who has suffered permanent disabilities from being forced to spend days wading in the Gold Base sewage treatment ponds without any protective equipment at all. Elsewhere in the interview Marc Headley talks about the active concealment of crimes, frauds and even deaths at the Scientology Gold Base near Hemet in California:
“There is a girl by the name of Stacy Moxon, or Stacy Meyers, it’s a girl that worked at the INT base. They said she committed suicide. She was electrocuted to death in a high voltage transformer vault. Well, somebody told me she left a note, so it wasn’t really an accident. The church makes it, saying basically it was an accident. … No, she went in there and grabbed the vault. [She did it] because she wasn’t allow to leave the property to go see her husband and her family. She wasn’t being allowed to go. She was basically held captive there like every other person at the INT base and she’d only been there a few months. And she was basically like “I can’t take this anymore” and she even threatened and told other people that she was depressed and she never … she was separated from her husband who worked in Los Angeles. OK, well, her father is one of the lead litigation attorneys for the church, Ken Moxon. And he still fights for the church even though that happened to his daughter. And he doesn’t know there was a note. But, he still fights for the church. His daughter is dead because she wasn’t allowed to go down to Los Angeles and see them. … they do their due diligence to mop up and make sure there is no snail-trail left behind.”
It should also be noted that false reports about the death of Stacy Meyer Moxon would have been made to Riverside law enforcement and O.S.H.A. You can read about that and much more at:
http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/files/1256449_adwgy/cHeadleyInterview_25Apr2008__064923.pdf See page 17.
http://forums.enturbulation.org/7-general-discussion/marc-headley-interview-close-10000-listeners-12474/
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=5603
I had blue flagged and high-lighted the pages in the transcript that dealt with the death of Stacy Moxon. I also copied the three internal pages that dealt with the subject and stapled them to the top of “the second document.” There was no way Mr. Moxon could avoid reading about the extent he had been deceived by his Church and its ecclesiastical leadership. Moxon must have at least glanced at it as he slid it into his separate papers in his attaché case because he seemed to totally lose his focus and bearings.
Thus it was now Round Five to Anonymous!
- “These pro bono clients of yours, Berry. Do you send them bills?” “No, Mr. Moxon, because they are pro bono clients. Pro bono means I provide them with free legal services,” I said.
- “So you haven’t sent Sean Carasov a bill?” “No I haven’t. He’s a pro bono client,” I said.
- “And you haven’t sent Gareth Cales a bill?” “No, I haven’t,” I said, not knowing why I would have any basis for doing so!
- “Have you performed any services for which someone has promised to pay in the future?” “What sort of services would be asking about, Mr. Moxon?” I replied.
- “Have you performed any legal services for which someone has promised to pay in the future?” “No,” I responded.
- “Have you received any payments from the German government during the past year?” “No, but I do not know whether I will be able to give the same answer for this year in connection with the German, French, English and Belgium governments,” I replied.
- “What do you do with your time, Berry?” “I provide pro bono legal services to people,” I responded. “I guess your clients get what they pay for,” mocked Moxon.
- “Why don’t you have any income, Berry?” “I’m too busy providing pro bono legal services to the victims of your harassment and intimidation,” I replied. “Anyway, in a 1976 Granada Television investigative report L. Ron Hubbard said that these days one could not afford to have any income and that he was loafing. Well, Mr. Moxon if it was good enough for L. Ron Hubbard it is good enough for me. I’m doing some loafing Mr. Moxon,” I replied as he tried to talk over the top of me and mess with the court reporter’s transcription. “Berry, if you don’t stop making statements I am going to go before Judge Snyder and get more sanctions imposed against you,” threatened Moxon. “Ask your next question,” I commanded. “Oh, and I have just found this print-out of what your organization is still saying about me on www.ReligiousFreedomWatch.Org. Would like this copy?” Moxon snapped back, “Keep it.”
- “Do you have a telephone?” “No,” I responded. “Do you use one of Jane Scott’s telephone lines? “Yes,” I replied.
- “Do you have a cell phone Berry?” “Of course,” Mr. Moxon, “It’s the safest way to communicate when dealing with your organization.” “Berry, you’re a liar,” sneered Moxon.
- “How do you pay for your cell phone?” I pay for it as I can. $20 here and $20 there. It’s a pay-as-you-go cell phone,” I replied.
- “You mean it is one of those cheap disposable cell phones?” “Yes Mr. Moxon, it is,” I replied while thinking that Moxon was trying to associate with the communication tools of a terrorist.
- “Are you a party to any contracts?” “Yes. With Lexis/Nexis,” I answered. “You pay for Lexis service?” enquired Moxon while Ms. Paquette continued with her slavish note passing and brown-nosing. “No, I do not. I purchased a software program several years ago and Lexis/Nexis provides the yearly maintenance,” I explained.
- “Are you a party to any other contract with any other person?” “Mr. Moxon,” I exclaimed. “As I sit here right now I cannot think of any other contract I have with any other person, any entity, any body thetan, any alien being, Xenu himself or any other life form.” There was amused twittery from the row of Anonymous behind me.
By now we were about one-hour into the deposition and Moxon seemed spent. He scowled, said he thought he was nearly finished and that he would be back in a few minutes. He and Ava Paquette then left Judge Hill’s conference room followed by the Atkinson-Baker court reporter. “He’ll be telephoning back to his superiors at O.S.A. or even talking with D.M.,” I said to those remaining in the room. Their reactions gushed forth. “What a slimy douche bag.” “He’s such a piece of garbage.” “Moxon’s lower than the lowest scum.” “The man’s evil.” “And who dresses Paquette? She needs a major make-over. That outfit and hair-do!” “Why does Paquette keeping passing notes to Moxon?” “That snake tried to make Graham look like a child molester.” Moxon, Paquette and the Atkinson-Baker court reporter then returned to Judge Hill’s conference room. “What did D.M. have to say to me?” I asked Moxon who replied, “You’re a loser, Berry and we’re done here.” I ordered a copy of the transcript and we were “off the record.”
Moxon and Paquette remained seated as the Anonymouses and me stood and prepared to exit the conference room. Moxon then smirked at the Anonymouses and Mister X and snarled, “Do you boys know what sort of person Berry really is? There’s this guy Cipriano who said that …” Kone Anonymous cut Moxon off mid-sentence. “I would trust Graham Berry with my life,” he forcefully snapped at Moxon while staring straight into Moxons face.” Taken aback but still able to splutter, Moxon hissed back, “What would you know about Scientology? You’re just protesting against Scientology because it is now the cool thing to do.” Kone Anonymous laughed back at the reeling Moxon. “Actually I know a lot about Scientology. They have harassed my family in the past. You moved two Scientologists into my college housing unit in order to spy on me and you had a Sea Org staffer in his uniform sit beside me in an empty railway carriage for three hours yesterday,” responded this courageous and feisty young man. Moxon beamed with successful accomplishment. He could hardly contain himself, “If we’ve been following you that means we’ve identified you,” Moxon gushed. “Yes,” Said Kone. “You’ve identified me. Latham & Watkins sent me a cease and desist letter and a DVD. I laughed because I have not been involved in any of the crazy terrorist things that Scientology alleges against Anonymous.” I chimed back in, saying, “Yes, Moxon, he was on David Schindler’s letter list.” Ava Paquette wanted to be heard too. Looking at me she said, “I’ve heard tape recordings of the death threats.” Smiling at her I said, “But you haven’t connected those tape-recordings with any of the Anonymous participants, have you?” Kone Anonymous chimed back in, “Exactly, even the F.B.I. said that Anonymous was not involved in what Scientology alleged.” I shushed him again and said, “Don’t tell him anything about the F.B.I.” Ava Paquette decided she had more mud to sling at me herself. “Well, it’s not just Cipriano who accused Berry of being a child molester. It was also Hurtado.” I was astonished. “Ava,” I said, “I cannot believe you would still rely on recanted perjury that was the product of blackmail and bribery and other crimes. And Hurtado was 23-years-old.” Even more astonishingly she continued, “Well, Hurtado may have been 23 but he had a mental problem, a learning disability.” I laughed in response, “A learning disability while attending Santa Monica College?” Embarrassed at being cornered, Ava Paquette then turned her venom upon the three Anonymous men. “Have you read Dianetics?” she snapped. Kone Anonymous replied over and above the other two. “Actually I have and it sucked,” said Kone Anonymous. Turning to Moxon, Kone continued, “I had little respect for you when I arrived here today but I was prepared to let you earn it. I’m sorry but you lost it. I have absolutely no respect for you now. You’re the lowest of the low. Let’s get out of here.”
Moxon however was not to be rebuffed so easily. “Berry doesn’t want us telling you all this stuff about him,” Moxon blurted out. “He was a partner in three different law firms over three years.” Yes, I thought. Scientology Fair Game against senior partners can cause that to happen. Moxon raced on, “And we had him suspended from legal practice. Here, read the California Bar Journal summary.” That hurts I thought as I remembered that the California Bar Journal summary had severely misrepresented what I had stipulated to when I was confronted with the choice of either spending two years fighting and appealing a clearly Scientology contrived and compromised State Bar prosecution, or stipulating to a short suspension and going to New Zealand to assist with the at-home care of my dying mother. Moxon handed one of the Anonymous a copy of the California State Bar Journal summary of my suspension for being, in essence, a vexatious and sanctioned litigant as fraudulently procured by Moxon, Paquette, Gerald Chaleff and their other attorney cohorts before conflicted Superior Court Judge Alexander Williams, III and Federal Judge Snyder (although it may have been one of her law clerks that was compromised and corrupted). The Anonymous took the photo-copy document from Moxon, laughed and handed it across to me. These young men are spunky. They were confronted by the Dark Side of Scientology and they just stared it down courageously and bravely.
Moxon was almost frothing by now. He was not getting anywhere “third partying” these three young men standing behind his nemesis, me. “Stand back three feet, Berry,” instructs Moxon. “Oh, Moxon,” I said. “You’re not going to give us your standing three-feet behind the back of your head demonstration, are you?” I asked. By now Moxon was feverish and frantic. “I took Berry’s doctor’s deposition in the Hurtado case. It’s a sealed confidential transcript but if Berry gives me permission I will tell you about his medical secrets. Tell them, Berry. Tell them that it is okay for me to talk about your medical secrets.” I was shocked by such a blatant disregard of all ethical rules and standards by Moxon and Paquette. A retired Superior Court Judge had held that Moxon and Paquette were engaged in crime and fraud against me in the Hurtado case, and that the attorney-client privilege did not protect the communications among the conspiring attorneys who included the President of the Los Angeles County Criminal Defense Attorney’s Association. Moxon and his Scientology co-counsel Elliot Abelson had quickly dismissed the case before their fingers were burned any further. One morning after a hearing in his manufactured Hurtado case against me, Moxon stood next to my insurance funded defense attorney and me and started asking me about personal medical matters he had learned of while deposing my doctor in the Hurtado case which he had contrived and solicited purely for Fair Game purposes. Of course, the Scientology compromised California State Bar sees nothing wrong with any of this, if it is being done by the attorneys for a Church! Moxon, an officer of the court, was unrelenting in this unique public performance in Judge Hillman’s conference room. “Berry, you’re scared. You don’t want me to tell these boys your medical secrets. Come on, Berry, say I can tell them about the deposition of your doctor in the Hurtado case?” I coolly answered, “No, Moxon, I’m not consenting to anything of the sort.” Like most people I prefer the contents of my medical records to remain confidential.
Moxon was undeterred in his effort to defame and slime me in front of these members of the public at the same court where we are both officers of the court. “So I can’t tell them about your medical files Berry. Well I’ll tell them about your drug and alcohol problems. You did file a declaration saying you were having problems practicing law because of you had drug and alcohol problems, didn’t you.” How does this lawyer get away with all he does I thought. “Moxon,” I replied. “That’s the same stuff as you keep posting on your hate web-site at www.religiousfreedomwatch.org. I gave up drinking nine years ago and I did it without Narconon. Incidentally, you’d be amazed at how many people want to sue Narconon, and to sue for asbestos exposure on the Freewinds, and to sue for personal injuries caused by David Miscavige, and who want to file refund claims.” Moxon’s nostrils flared. “You’re not having any impact on us.” I lunged back, “I arrived on your doorstep in 1990 and ever since 1991 the church has been declining. This year alone Gross Income is down 50%, Gold Base has shrunk from 1,200 staffers to 400 staffers and your own O.S.A. has shrunk from 150 to around 30 staffers.” Moxon fell silent, probably wondering about my figures. Perhaps they are not statistically perfect but the “trend” is obvious. Also, it is obvious to everyone that the course rooms are empty and that completions are few. If the “celebrities” jumped ship, the whole façade would soon crumble.
Moxons wail returned me to present time. “He admitted it. Theyre trying to destroy us,” screeched Moxon. This distortion was too much for one of the Anonymice. “No, were not,” he chimed in. “We just want to eliminate Scientologys abuses such as Fair Game. Its obvious that the Church is still practicing it. You’ve been using it all afternoon. This is Fair Game in action.” Congratulations, I thought. He had read the memo and was not afraid to sling a few words of his own around.
Later, I would explain to the Anonymous that what they had just seen was part of a continuing pattern of R.I.C.O. conduct directed by the Church of Scientology against me, Anonymous and a whole lot of other people including Gerry Armstrong, Lawrence Wollersheim, Paulette Cooper, Bob Minton, Ken Dandar, Keith Henson, Ursula Caberta, Tommy Gorman, Jesse Prince, Mark Bunker, Jon Atack and many dozens of others over a twenty-five year period at the very least. Domestic psycho-terrorism being waged with impunity by a Hollywood-headquartered coercive organization, funding crime and fraud with millions of dollars of tax-exempt “donations” provided by Hollywood Celebrities such as Tom Cruise and businessmen such as Australian media magnate James Packer. Meanwhile, a number of European nations are considering banning the Church of Scientology because it is a foreign (Hollywood) headquartered terrorist organization. In addition, only last month the Belgium Police raided and closed the Church of Scientology in Brussels for being engaged in fraud and the unlicensed practice of medicine. Similar action was taken in Russia. Scientologys religious status is openly questioned in Europe. For example, see http://web.uni-marburg.de/religionswissenschaft/journal/mjr/beit.html
It is pertinent to note that the O.S.A. legal unit of Moxon & Kobrin, and their employed attorney Ava Paquette: (1) Maintain the copyright registrations of the various Church of Scientology written policies and practices for the handling of Suppressive Persons; (2) Send the cease and desist alleged copyright violation letters; (3) File and maintain the copyright law suits and Internet T.O.S. complaints; (4) Hire the private investigators to unveil the identity of Anonymice and to harass them, their families, colleagues and employers; and (5) File and maintain frivolous lawsuits, such as the “Bowles & Moxon Plan 100″ against the old Cult Awareness Network (C.A.N.).
Anyway, I digress from the amazingly and blatantly improper public performance by attorneys Kendrick Moxon and Ava Paquette. In my opinion, for whatever that is worth, such arrogance is produced by a sense of invincible impunity because of the Scientology corruption of the State Bar, law enforcement and the courts. The young men of Anonymous were now angered by Moxons and Paquettes attacks on me. They bravely faced Moxon, who they would later call “the snake.” To paraphrase from Scientology, these three Anonymous young men had bravely moved the cause of Anonymous to a new level in reshaping the destiny of Scientology. In recognition of their bravery and achievement, they will be the first recipients of The Bee Jay Trust Freedom Medal.
I decided that wisdom would be the better part of valor this day. I didnt want to be a party to Moxon and Kobrin losing their cool and doing something really stupid within the Federal Court building. Their “TRs were way out.” They were severely “down tone” and “down stat.” Anonymous does not forgive. Anonymous does not forget. “Come on, guys,” I said firmly. “Lets get out of here before this gets out of hand.” One of the Anonymous added, “Why give these weasels any more time? They didn’t get anything today.”
And so we merrily exited Judge Hillman’s conference and the Federal Courthouse. The Anonymous May global “Operation: Fair Game: STOP” had been launched, unwittingly by Scientology’s main Fair Game weapons, Moxon, Kobrin and Paquette, against one of Scientology’s most regular Fair Game targets, me.
After all was said and done, what had Moxon obtained during the course of Cinco de Moxon and at what continuing cost to Scientology? Nothing new, except the empty Bee Jay Trust. “You are such a free spirit,” I was recently told. Yes, I thought, and it is so satisfying. Being both an SP and free BT is fun. Cinco de Moxon was such an epic win for Anonymous. They are Legion. Expect them.
Humbly yours,
Graham Berry, SP Level 7.
(For an explanation of the SP Levels click on http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.Scientology/browse_thread/thread/5971)
To file a State Bar of California complaint against a lawyer click on, http://www.calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_generic.jsp?cid=10136&id=1144
Posted in ANONYMOUS, BERRY, PICKET REPORTS | 5 Comments »